The Viral Infection known as the Internet

Hello DIGC202 fellows and any others who should find this blog. During this week in DIGC202, Global Networks, we examined the evolution of the world’s nervous system thanks to the advent of electricity and the telegraph. With the arrival of Samuel Morse’s dot dash style telegraph in 1838, an easier system to use than the more complex telegraph created in 1837, a need for mass wiring arose (Mitew 2014a). This resulted in the first undersea cable across the English Channel linking Great Britain and America in 1851 and the laying of the more successful trans-Atlantic cable in 1866 than its faulty 1858 counterpart (Mitew 2014a).

However, this technology was expensive and as such, preserved for the elite who could afford to send messages across the divide. But, this would all change with the arrival of the radio telegraph in 1895, a much cheaper medium that allowed the masses to shoot messages across the world via telegraph offices (Mitew 2014b). Mitew (2014b; 2014c) explains that this technology brought forth the imperialistic notion of the world as a “…single body, wires and cables – its nerves.” What Mitew means is that the telegraph obliterated the notion of duration and distance that occurred at this time, bringing people around the globe together with a network of wires and cables that allowed people to communicate and obtain news about different events happening in countries other than their own, unifying the world.

Various other technologies later developed which helped unify the world even further, but the only one which closely mirrors the creation of the original global nervous system, the first global network, was the internet. What brought the internet into fruition was the launch of the first satellite, Sputnik 1, by the Soviet Union in 1957, which presented an issue for America as they wondered how a post-nuclear America would allow authorities to communicate (Sterling 1993, pg. 1). Paul Baran came to their rescue in 1964 with his idea of creating a network which should be assumed to be unreliable at times, be able to transcend its own unreliability, that all nodes in the network would be equal in status, and that each node would have the authority to originate, pass, and receive a message (Sterling 1993, pg. 1). In addition, these messages would be divided into packets at a specified node, each separately addressed, and then sent to a specific node via random routes (Sterling 1993, pg. 1). With this strategy, it didn’t matter whether some nodes were destroyed as the message would just take another route to its destination.

By 1969, Baran’s idea came to fruition with the formation of ARPANET, with four nodes linking four computers together (Sterling 1993, pg. 1). As technology advanced and computers got faster and cheaper, the masses began to gain access to ARPANET. Eventually ARPA’s original standard for communication, NCP (Network Control Protocol), was succeeded by TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol), a more sophisticated standard that converted messages into streams of packets at the originating node before reassembling them again once they had reached their destination (Sterling 1993, pg. 2). IP (Internet Protocol) sees that the packets are sent across multiple nodes across multiple networks with multiple standards e.g. Ethernet, FDDI etc. (Sterling 1993, pg. 2).

As TCP/IP became more common and access to more powerful computers was gained, people began to link their computers to a growing network of networks now known as the internet. Sterling (2013) describes this phenomena as the original, ARPANET, being superseded by its mutant child, the internet, making such a phenomena mirror the process of a parasite taking over its host. This viral infection known as the internet is not necessarily a bad or even inherently a bad thing, it is made bad by those who would abuse it. Such abuse comes into the fore when we consider the spread of media literacy.

Stadler (2005) looks at how the spread of media literacy has expanded the range of people able to consume media/cultural objects produced by industries and everyday people (pg. 14). With the advancement of digital technologies, the differentiation between cultural objects and cultural exchanges is shrinking (Stadler 2005, pg. 14-15). Cultural exchanges, once fluid, can now take on a form, although not always physical e.g. books, audio files, video files etc. which presents a problem for the authors and artists of today. Because these pieces of cultural exchange can take on the form of a cultural object that is also fluid, it is easier than ever for the “…processes of telling, re-telling, changing and transforming… (Stadler 2005, pg. 15)” to occur. This means that people are now equipped with the technology to exchange fluid cultural objects with each other, and more seriously, exchanging fluid cultural objects on an illegal basis such as copyrighted music files.

With the steady advancement of technology and the arrival of the infection known as the internet, it has become easier than ever to steal fluid cultural objects, such as music files, under the guise of exchange, and the truth is, there is not much we can do about it. Except, of course, believing in the inherent moral goodness of those around us not to download or give people access to copyrighted media.


Mitew, T 2014a, A Global Nervous System: From the Telegraph to Cyberspace [Part 1], online video, 04 August, YouTube, viewed 6 August 2015,

Mitew, T 2014b, A Global Nervous System: From the Telegraph to Cyberspace [Part 2], online video, 04 August, YouTube, viewed 6 August 2015,

Mitew, T 2014c, A Global Nervous System: From the Telegraph to Cyberspace [Part 3], online video, 04 August, YouTube, viewed 6 August 2015,

Mitew, T 2014d, A Global Nervous System: From the Telegraph to Cyberspace [Part 4], online video, 04 August, YouTube, viewed 6 August 2015,

Stadler, F 2005, Open Cultures and the Nature of Networks, Futura publikacije, Novi Sad

Sterling, B 1993, A Short History of the Internet, Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, viewed 07 August 2015

Taylor, E 2014, Internet and the World, image, Emily Taylor Internet Research, viewed 09 August 2015,


6 thoughts on “The Viral Infection known as the Internet

  1. Great post! I like how you simply yet effectively portrayed how communications has progressed from morse code to the current internet which is almost like a virus of its own.
    The notion of cultural fluidity is really interesting, and is something I hadn’t really considered. We are lucky being one of the first generations to be able to experience culture from around the globe at a click of a mouse.

    1. Thank you so much! I was really interested by the cultural fluidity as well. You are right in that we are extremely lucky to be able to experience different cultures as it allows us to expand our interests and to grow as people. But I do worry for the future of artistry as people take advantage of the internet to subvert the process of paying for cultural objects and content.

  2. The fact that you bring up about piracy is an interesting one, while I do never condone stealing, I don’t agree with companies withholding information from others, as this disadvantages and isolates targeted groups. As a person living in the Australia how many times have you had a sign saying that ‘This content is not available in your region’. In this day and age there is no reason why we shouldn’t be able to access content from around the globe, it all comes down to the issue of net neutrality. Secondly the internet has allowed the exchange of information to parties that are infected, we have all seen the rise of citizen journalism and the whole free the people attitude that comes from those on WikiLeaks.But I do agree with you that there are dark activities that the internet has facilitated such as piracy and child pornography. Just want to say that I love the blog look and writing style. Here is a article that I though you might enjoy about the good, bad and ugly regarding the internet.
    Happy blogging 🙂

  3. Great post.
    I really liked your point about the changing access levels that various cultures around the world are experiencing with regard to the internet. It’s probably safe to say that communication and information exchange afforded through the use of the internet has made the world a much ‘smaller’ place.
    I’m not really sure how you could improve on this, maybe more pictures?
    Here’s an interesting article about cultural exchange:

  4. Great post this week,
    You have engaged throughly and well with the weeks topic in conjunction with its readings, and in turn have furthered my understanding on the topic.
    I appreciated your use of time lining the inventions in which lead to our large communication network in which we have today, it aided my understanding and allowed the post to flow well.

  5. Really eloquently researched and you makes some really great points that you explain explicitely. My only critique, is that unfortunately it’s rather unfit for a media based blog. Great for an academic journal, fantastic even, but for a public blog in a media sphere it’s way above any expectations and a lot of people would click away quickly.

    It’s great writing for an essay, but you should try and find a more casual voice that speaks to a blogging community ^_^

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s